14 ms·
> the most damning ones.. It doesn't really seem so, or at least they seem no better or worse than what's been released already. Trump supporters have been wa
by imron 10y ago
> the most damning ones..
It doesn't really seem so, or at least they seem no better or worse than what's been released already.
Trump supporters have been waiting months for the Wikileaks bombshell, October^H^H^H^H^H^H^H, errr.. November surprise, that will destroy Hillary and put her behind bars, implicating her in arms sales, pay for play access to the government, treason and if you follow the crazies, pedophile child trafficking and satanic cults.
Each time, the next batch is going to be the one with the damning information that brings her down, and each batch it's more of the same.
Sure, the contents don't speak well of Hillary, her team, or the media (and I think based on her actions she probably shouldn't be allowed near any sort of classified information again), but these are not the damning bombshells people have been fantasizing about, and those bombshells likely don't exist, because if they did, they would have been released well before millions of people had already voted, and not on the eve of the election.
- jgome 10y ago> if they did, they would have been released well before millions of people had already voted, and not on the eve of the election. Assange has claimed multiple times, that he thinks these elections are a farce... Perhaps he knows some things you and me don't. BTW, I'm not a trump supporter (not even a US citizen), but I don't think Clinton is better than him, at least for the rest of the world. Trump talks a lot, but his administration will probably be more or less the continuation of the Bush/Obama policies, particularly the foreign policy...
- imron 10y ago> I'm not a trump supporter (not even a US citizen) Me too! With Hillary I think American foreign policy will definitely be a continuation (she was the person in charge of it for 4 years), and that's not such a good thing for the rest of the world. At least with Trump there is the possibility that things could change. I also quite like his ideas around addressing corruption in politics, though again as you mentioned, whether or not he'd be able to actually do anything about it if elected is a different matter entirely.
- impossiblegame 10y agoYou like the corruption strategy of a politician whose entire career is corruption. His "charitable" foundation pays his legal bills FCS.
- jgome 10y ago> whose entire career is corruption. His "charitable" foundation pays his legal bills FCS. Meanwhile... From https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/795284806510714881 https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/795284806510714881 > Chelsea Clinton used Clinton Foundation resources for her wedding -- email from top Bill Clinton aid Doug Band https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/52046#efmABYACC https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/52046#efmABYACC
- imron 10y agoI like the points he mentioned as a specific policy proposal here: https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trumps-five-point-plan-for-ethics-reform https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trumps... Please let me know which ones you disagree with.
- mzw_mzw 10y ago> Assange has claimed multiple times, that he thinks these elections are a farce... Perhaps he knows some things you and me don't. I imagine Russian intelligence knows lots of things you and me don't, yes.