3 ms·
Yes there is. The same way there is money to be made in providing premium content. You could pay for extra capacity, bandwidth, fault tolerance, indexing, archi
by dkarapetyan 10y ago
Yes there is. The same way there is money to be made in providing premium content. You could pay for extra capacity, bandwidth, fault tolerance, indexing, archiving, and many other desirable properties you'd need out of your messaging layer.
Instead the convoluted strategy by the higher-ups destroyed the entire thing. They thought they could make money with ads and "promoted content" but they somehow managed to fumble the execution of that one as well.
- phmagic 10y agoI think this is the Medium strategy. I think there is a mid size business in it, but one that's hard to defend and will see margins erode with time. There is absolutely no "moat" in Twitter being a protocol.
- dkarapetyan 10y agoYou'd be surprised what happens when you become a hub and start seeing the effects of 3rd party integrations. That aspect can be turned into a moat if managed properly.
- phmagic 10y agoI think you are right but there's a time and place for it. I don't think it can save Twitter at this point but could have created a healthy ecosystem if timed well. But it's very hard to time this well. Even Facebook and their apps ecosystem didn't create enough of a moat.
- enraged_camel 10y agoWell, Facebook's "app ecosystem" was dominated by Zynga. For a long time, Farmville was the top app and it was the only app that Facebook's highest engagement users interacted with. As such, when Zynga went downhill, it took the entire ecosystem with it.
- wvenable 10y agoIf it was a truly open API layer, I could get these things from third parties. If it's not truly open, nobody would commit to using it.
- omouse 10y agoThe only people who win with ads are those who make money already and don't really need the ads. It's not worthwhile.