4 ms·
That's an extremely strong claim to back up with no evidence. The commenter above you has given at least anecdotal evidence of substantial opportunity for fraud
by maehwasu 10y ago
That's an extremely strong claim to back up with no evidence. The commenter above you has given at least anecdotal evidence of substantial opportunity for fraud, and we already know motive is strong on both sides.
- specialist 10y agoWhat measure of proof do you require?
- tropo 10y agoWell, how about the same ID you'd need to board a plane or buy alcohol or deal with being stopped by a cop? Let's start with that. To reduce forgery, match the ID against an image of it on a computer. Better yet, scan it into a computer and have the computer do the matching. Also, take a new picture. This can be used to help catch and prosecute any remaining fraud. More importantly, such fraud would be strongly discouraged by the increased possibility of being caught.
- specialist 10y agoHmmm. Let's try again. GP wrote: "...the only fraud happening in our elections are a) gerrymandering and b) racist voter suppression laws..." You wrote: "That's an extremely strong claim to back up with no evidence." I asked: "What measure of proof do you require?" Honestly, I expected something related to proving gerrymandering, disenfranchisement, or something.