3 ms·
> "i also agree these take homes are not 4 hour affairs. they give you no direction so you can't sacrifice ui/ux for functionality because you have no clue how
by strictnein 10y ago
> "i also agree these take homes are not 4 hour affairs. they give you no direction so you can't sacrifice ui/ux for functionality because you have no clue how they judge it."
I had a take home for a UI position that I spent ~10-12 hours on. It was some pretty standard UI stuff and they had 5 points of functionality they wanted you to code. Make it responsive, have these sections in a different order on mobile, make X do Y when you click Z, etc etc.
At the interview, two technical peers walked through what I had submitted. Their questions made it really clear they had no idea what problems I was supposed to solve.
- Why didn't you write a complete RESTful backend to serve this data? (the instructions literally said not to)
- Why didn't you use a CSS pre-processor? (the code required ~30 lines of CSS)
- Why doesn't this button work? (it wasn't supposed to)
- Why doesn't this code work on a mobile device? (it worked just fine on mobile devices)
Really just a strange, strange experience.
- pmiller2 10y agoGiven their cluelessness, would you even want to work with them? I'm guessing you "failed" that interview, and it was probably a good thing, too.
- lj3 10y agoI hear this a lot in these kinds of discussions. While I agree with you that these might not be the best people to work with, the equation looks very different after doing these kinds of interviews for 6 months and you really need a paycheck yesterday.