3 ms·
Ah, not this again. Just because they are NASA doesn't mean they are immune from pseudoscience.[1][2] [1] http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2015/05/26/w
by maverick_iceman 10y ago
Ah, not this again. Just because they are NASA doesn't mean they are immune from pseudoscience.[1][2]
[1] http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2015/05/26/warp-drives-and-scientific-reasoning/ http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2015/05/26/warp-dri...
[2] http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/outthere/2014/08/06/nasa-validate-imposible-space-drive-word/#.VCYphStdU3c http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/outthere/2014/08/06/nasa-v...
- vorotato 10y agoFirstly, warpdrives aren't pseudoscience. The author is not claiming that they presently have a warp-drive. They are merely claiming they have some evidence that one might be theoretically possible. This isn't that inconceivable, sure it might take a thousand years before we could actually implement it. Finally about the "EMDrive" there's no reason to believe that energy isn't escaping it, but that it's doing so in a way that something might be learned outside of imprecise measurements.