> No need for the USB-A. Just switch to C. You won't need to orient your power cord, and you'll have more throughput Sadly, almost everything is still USB-A. U

> No need for the USB-A. Just switch to C. You won't need to orient your power cord, and you'll have more throughput Sadly, almost everything is still USB-A. USB sticks, 2FA tokens, mechanical keyboards, mice, and - oh yeah - iPhone charging cables. Would I like to move to USB-C? Sure. But as a professional, there's going to be some situations where I need that backwards compatibility, if not for me then for some client. There's going to be a really long transition period, because all that USB-A stuff is still 100% functional. And if you argue that adapters are the solution, then clearly we still need at least 1 port, so why not leave it? Design is supposed to improve usability. Technology is always a compromise, but for many people, thickness wasn't an issue in the first place. (BTW, magsafe power cords don't need orientating. Kind of a solved problem) > If you maintain the USB-A, users will keep using it instead of switching to the superior alternative and driving progress. This argument is backwards. If it's superior, then people will switch. For many use cases, USB-C offers no practical benefit - in other words, it's a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. Is one USB-A port too much to ask for, for the sake of backwards compatibility and potential emergency use? On the other hand, ironically people (including me) would pay $$$ for a USB-C iPhone. That application of USB-C is clearly superior!