3 ms·
While users just want to do some simple things, they do care about the downsides and annoyances (that we know grow directly from lock-in). FB people already gr
by roc 17y ago
While users just want to do some simple things, they do care about the downsides and annoyances (that we know grow directly from lock-in). FB people already grumble about privacy, the meaningless of 'likes' and 'friends', the annoyance of all those third-party apps spamming friends of the player, etc. They're ready for change. They may not care about 'how', but they absolutely will care whether the next destination has those problems.
Sure, you need to wrap features into the protocol that will appeal to FB people. You should absolutely take the opportunity to solve some real problems. But the open architecture is crucial to protecting privacy. Without competition, no flavor-of-the-month network has incentive to put user needs ahead of its own wants.
- Aetius 17y agoBuilding that and attracting even a small fraction of Facebooks users would be next to impossible; harder than building another Google.
- stcredzero 17y agoOnly if you want to attract them away from Facebook. There's no need for that. All one has to provide is an alternative channel for communications that can effectively use Facebook as a directory, but provide private communications and updates under the user's control.