> Sadly, the author failed to read on the history of kdbus and AF_BUS On the contrary, I've been following their development from the beginning, with some inte

> Sadly, the author failed to read on the history of kdbus and AF_BUS On the contrary, I've been following their development from the beginning, with some interest. > This is more or less what dbus currently does Actually D-Bus multiplexes all messages, so they all pass through the message bus daemon. What I'm proposing is clearly different. > and has major issues with memory accounting This is a valid technical point, though I'm not sure it's ever been a problem in practice and I'm not convinced it needed a whole new IPC mechanism to solve.