> This entire conversation is something that is completely removed from the original point of the article which was moving goalposts. Perhaps. I feel that your

> This entire conversation is something that is completely removed from the original point of the article which was moving goalposts. Perhaps. I feel that your article misrepresented the argument against CETA when it used it as an example. I realise that you probably don't want to argue about this (nor do I, really), but I felt it was important to provide a contrary perspective. That's all.