> fingerprints are junk science? Really? The seem to be fairly reliable: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fingerprint https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fingerprint A

> fingerprints are junk science? Really? The seem to be fairly reliable: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fingerprint https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fingerprint Also with the other, it seems to me they are not 'junk science'. More they are indicators, not absolutes. So people are using them incorrectly, not they shouldn't be used.