4 ms·
Why would it be safer to implement Vec as a "language feature" as opposed to implementing it in the library? We actually used to implement Vec as a language fe
by pcwalton 10y ago
Why would it be safer to implement Vec as a "language feature" as opposed to implementing it in the library?
We actually used to implement Vec as a language feature, and it was a lot of work to write things like growth in raw LLVM IR (which is a miserable programming language) instead of just using a real programming language—Rust—to do it.
- dreta 10y agoNever said any of this.