4 ms·
Keep in mind this is a government we're currently selling weapons to: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-lockheed-fighter-turkey-idUSKCN12S2G1?il=0 http://www.r
by rch 10y ago
Keep in mind this is a government we're currently selling weapons to:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-lockheed-fighter-turkey-idUSKCN12S2G1?il=0 http://www.reuters.com/article/us-lockheed-fighter-turkey-id...
- simonsarris 10y agoPresumably the US is selling/arming Kurds that are rebelling against the regime, too. This was one of the emails released yesterday, though it is dated 2014: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/43648#efmAtVAz1 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/43648#efmAtVAz1 >> On Aug 17, 2014 3:50 PM, "H" <hrod17@clintonemail.com> wrote: >>> 3. In the past the USG, in an agreement with the Turkish General Staff, >>> did not provide such heavy weapons to the Peshmerga, out of a concern that >>> they would end up in the hands of Kurdish rebels inside of Turkey. The >>> current situation in Iraq, not to mention the political environment in >>> Turkey, makes this policy obsolete. Also this equipment can now be >>> airlifted directly into the KRG zone. Point 5. is missing from that email, for whatever reason.
- frandroid 10y agoThe KRG, despite being Kurds, are besties with the Turkish government (a pipeline going out of Iraqi Kurdistan exports oil through Turkey), and rather at loggerheads with the PKK (Kurdish rebels in Turkey), so there's little chance of the weapons passing from the KRG to the PKK.
- simonsarris 10y agoThis is good context, thanks.
- atakurt 10y agoyeah ,keep going keeping in mind , what were you doing with weapons at afghanistan , iraq , vietnam ? spreading democracy ?
- pjc50 10y agoWell, they're in NATO and the crucial barrier between the "West" on one side and Syria & Russia on the other.