4 ms·
The topic is running containers in production. Why not use a base os designed for that?
by moondev 10y ago
The topic is running containers in production. Why not use a base os designed for that?
- mschuster91 10y agoBecause the base OS needs to be something an admin can work comfortably on, esp. if the host is supposed to run other things besides docker (e.g. a database, you do not want to run mysql over a network if possible). And for this you need a "real" base OS, which will be either apt-flavor (debian/ubuntu) or rpm-flavor (rhel, sles), depending on the organization.
- moondev 10y agoWhy not run your database on a different machine then. Separation of concerns. Have a cluster a machines for containers so you can take advantage of it's strengths instead of trying to duct tape everything together on machine
- mschuster91 10y ago> Why not run your database on a different machine then. Separation of concerns. While true in general, you always end up introducing latency (simply because it's on a different host) and possible packet losses/retransmits (e.g. when the switch buffer memory overruns). Given the "hft" in the blog name (high-speed financial transactions), both can equal losses of money.