3 ms·
And this is what is so painful for the rest of us to watch or deal with. This inability for the Linux folks to admit these glaring architectural problems. Alri
by mancerayder 10y ago
And this is what is so painful for the rest of us to watch or deal with. This inability for the Linux folks to admit these glaring architectural problems.
Alright, the suspense is killing me: what OS is the one that gets it right? I ask this to "the rest of us" as you put it.
- gkfasdfasdf 10y agoFrom the username, x86 BSD perhaps?
- X86BSD 10y agoSmartOS, FreeBSD, Tredly, etc
- mmagin 10y agoAh, you must be from the alternate universe where most of us have heard of more than one of those!
- eropple 10y agoWhat you've heard of, and what's workable and useful, do not necessarily intersect.
- SSLy 10y agoTredly is "just" a FreeBSD distribution. And Linux can't have ZFS in-tree because CDDL.
- X86BSD 10y agoIt is not just a version of FreeBSD. The base is FreeBSD but the tooling for containers is not stock. It's value added bits that are shaping up to be very nice for containers on a more stable, secure, and storage friendly stack.
- SSLy 10y agoYes, but the storage parts which the discussions are about are from FreeBSD
- X86BSD 10y agoSmartOS, FreeBSD, Tredly, etc
- pmarreck 10y agoNixOS intrigues me as an attempt to create a completely deterministic build.