3 ms·

A postmortem on nanomsg begs to differ: http://sealedabstract.com/rants/nanomsg-postmortem-and-other-stories/ http://sealedabstract.com/rants/nanomsg-postmortem

• montyedwards 10y ago
  Not disagreeing with you or the postmortem, but: 1. that post is from Feb 8, 2016 2. nanomsg 1.0 was released on June 10, 2016 After nanomsg 1.0 release, recent activity on github includes: 8 days ago -- fixes #828 Add logical connections to UDP RFC 9 days ago -- fixes #827 nanomsg zerotier mapping rfc errors 11 days ago -- fixes #825 Extra tests in pipe.c gdamore committed 11 days ago 15 days ago -- fixes #800 accept4 not implemented on all systems 15 days ago -- fixes #783 WS transport - not connectable from Firefox 16 days ago -- fixes #821 NN_WS_HANDSHAKE_CRLF is silly And etc.
• omginternets 10y ago
  Hmm I missed it. In addition to the sibling comment above, the mangos project seems alive and well.
• widdma 10y ago
  After that, Garrett D'Amore eventually returned on condition he be BDFL. See https://github.com/nanomsg/nanomsg/issues/619 https://github.com/nanomsg/nanomsg/issues/619 Since then the project looks to be fairly healthy.
  • omginternets 10y ago
    Oh good! This is the guy behind mangos, too.