3 ms·
If you're just learning about ZeroMQ (or just reading this post) - I suggest taking some time to read or listen to some of Pieter Hintjens blogs/book/talks. It
by kzisme 10y ago
If you're just learning about ZeroMQ (or just reading this post) - I suggest taking some time to read or listen to some of Pieter Hintjens blogs/book/talks.
It's a wonderful experience and he seemed like a great/genuine dude.
- k__ 10y agoI think I will use PC3[0] in my next project. Seems like an easy and sane way to structure repos. [0] http://hintjens.com/blog:23 http://hintjens.com/blog:23
- kzisme 10y agoI really enjoyed Why Optimistic Merging Works Better[0] - and found it to be a very interesting topic and way to approach merging for projects. [0] http://hintjens.com/blog:106 http://hintjens.com/blog:106
- tel 10y agoHow would you review PC3 versus C4? It seems like C4 (https://rfc.zeromq.org/spec:42/C4 https://rfc.zeromq.org/spec:42/C4) is the latest evolution of this design. It seems to embrace optimistic merging even more than PC3 and does away with reviewers.
- k__ 10y agoHm, like he wrote it, it seems to be the other way around "The Pedantic Code Construction Contract (PC3) is an evolution of the GitHub Fork + Pull Model, and the ZeroMQ C4 process..."
- tel 10y agoThat's a good point. I was basing it on dates I could find and what I've been reading in Social Architecture. Perhaps the latest C4 is later and PC3 is smack in the middle