3 ms·
Ask HN: How many times has the “user” type been implemented?
We probably will never know, yet it doesn't matter. I think most people would agree that it's "too many", and that's the point I'm trying to make.
How come are we so quick to look for libraries and modules in the name of code reuse, yet we still reimplement common models/types/classes over and over again?
- Rannath 10y agoBecause trivial stuff is trivial. looking for a library is more work than implementing a trivial type.