3 ms·
Actually, by most accounts we did fine without them for 200,000 years.
by DrSprout 16y ago
Actually, by most accounts we did fine without them for 200,000 years.
- rbanffy 16y agoWe did just fine without them for a good couple dozen million years. It's just that we won't be able to do without them forever ;-) In fact, I like to tall my son the dinosaurs only died because they had neither rockets nor nukes.
- Tichy 16y agoYou realize that Armageddon was just a Hollywood movie, right? :-) I am not sure if the same thing would be feasible in the real world, with current technology. Nor am I convinced that we will eventually be able to escape our dieing sun, but I keep my fingers crossed.
- rbanffy 16y agoUnless we have a good couple years of advanced notice so we can gently push it in another direction, nukes are the best option. If you spread the thing wide enough, less of it will hit you. If the pieces are small enough, chances are few of them will do any damage. It won't do much good if the thing is the size of a state, but mountain-sized rocks seem manageable this way.
- DrSprout 16y agoLooking at the situation objectively, we will either destroy ourselves, or incidentally gain rocket technology capable of destroying an asteroid long before an extinction-level event occurs. There is no reason to make asteroid deflection a priority. There are far more pressing threats to the human race. Mostly the human race itself - and the humanities are the best defense against humans.
- sp332 16y agoIt's that 200,001st year that'll get ya.
- tjogin 16y agoThe dinosaurs beg to differ.
- kelnos 16y agoIn that case, we did just fine without them for 65 million years.