5 ms·
Unless it is the same person who created this PDF and this [1], it's some kind of plagiarism. [1] http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com http://neuralnetwork
by enedil 10y ago
Unless it is the same person who created this PDF and this [1], it's some kind of plagiarism.
[1] http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- madethemcry 10y agoThis is fermatslibrary.com a platform to annotate scientific papers. But I don't understand why that paper you cited is there - it's easy to read already.
- eriknstr 10y agoAgree. OP link should be changed to http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com/chap1.html http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com/chap1.html
- andars 10y agoFTA: "This is the first chapter of Michael Nielsen's book Neural Networks and Deep Learning." The book itself is CC BY-NC 3.0.
- franciscop 10y agoI would say that writing a "hidden" (by default) comment saying who is the author is stretching the "BY" too much...
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- ssivark 10y agoI'm guessing that the creator simply printed the webpage (without link on the header/footer), and has honestly referenced the source on the first comment. So probably there was no malice intended. I did however leave a Disqus comment on how they could make it clearer. The ones I could think of -- either print HTML to PDF with a link on the header, or modify the source of the page to add a note before you printing to PDF.