4 ms·
960x640 was a fairly obvious candidate for the resolution A candidate perhaps, but not at all obvious. It's a higher pixel density than any device Wikipedia kn
by orangecat 17y ago
960x640 was a fairly obvious candidate for the resolution
A candidate perhaps, but not at all obvious. It's a higher pixel density than any device Wikipedia knows about: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_displays_by_pixel_density http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_displays_by_pixel_densi.... Other alternatives that would have been at least as plausible would be to keep it the same ("only geeks care about meaningless specs like that") or go to 720x480, where 1.5x scaling wouldn't be that bad.