3 ms·
Meh, another heavily search engine optimized article from an affiliate. I skimmed throught it, but one particular thing caught my attention: > Initially, for p
by snicky 10y ago
Meh, another heavily search engine optimized article from an affiliate. I skimmed throught it, but one particular thing caught my attention:
> Initially, for pulling photos from my Canon 5D Mark III, I went running back to my old MacBook Pro. Over time, I've had to do that less and less. Now that I have an iPhone 7 Plus, I haven't gone back to my Canon once.
This is just ridiculous. How you can compare a high grade professional DSLR to an iphone? He's either lying about owning 5Dm3 or just spent heaps of money on something he doesn't need.
- mancerayder 10y agoGood catch. Well, we know he's certainly not a wedding photographer or a pro photographer of any kind. Not because I'm defining "pro" arbitrarily, but because it's extremely unlikely people would pay thousands of dollars for photos to a guy taking snaps with his iPhone. Not to mention that iPhones don't trigger strobe lights. Nor telephoto effects, not a bazillion other things that MKIII's have. The only thing in common with someone who selects between an iPhone 7 and a MKIII and two MacBooks to sync them to is the fact that they can afford these.
- rbanffy 10y agoI bet most people who buy similar cameras are not professional photographers. The best camera is the one you have with you. Sometimes I carry the good, big one, when I know I'll have lots of opportunities to play with it but, similarly, I have left it at home more often since my phones became decent enough to take reasonable pictures.