4 ms·
>All that is evidence of is that women give up more often than men Yes, that's the point. >That doesn't provide any evidence that it's because men's value is
by MustardTiger 10y ago
>All that is evidence of is that women give up more often than men
Yes, that's the point.
>That doesn't provide any evidence that it's because men's value is tied to achievement.
Indeed, that's what we're offering a potential explanation for.
>I could just as readily argue that women give up more than men because they have stronger priors of tech not being for them
Then do so. Saying "I could make a bunch of other arguments but won't because I know they are contradicted by evidence" is not compelling. In fact, I find it inherently dishonest, in that you are trying to rely on the assumption that any other random explanation you could put forth is just as good, but you won't put them forth because then they would be demonstrated to not be just as good.
- morgante 10y ago> Then do so. Sorry, I should have been clear: I do believe that my explanation (women quit more because they have a stronger prior of tech not being for them) is much stronger and more likely than yours. At the very least, its assumptions are backed by basic evidence (that there are fewer women in tech to look up to as role models).
- MustardTiger 10y agoExcept they are more likely to give up in other fields too. Even fields with lots of women in them. So no, your assumption is not backed by basic evidence.