4 ms·
Then you're simply wrong. Spending 10x the money on making sure all data is atomically written and freshly read is idiotic if there's no problem with reading sl
by OskarS 10y ago
Then you're simply wrong. Spending 10x the money on making sure all data is atomically written and freshly read is idiotic if there's no problem with reading slightly stale data.
- Annatar 10y agoYou are assuming that ten times more money needs to be spent, but without any real basis, that's nothing but a meaningless assertion. It doesn't have to be expensive to be fast, reliable and correct.