3 ms·
If one is only ever going to append to a database and never read it or use data in it, then one does not even need to store the data being appended, let alone n
by Annatar 10y ago
If one is only ever going to append to a database and never read it or use data in it, then one does not even need to store the data being appended, let alone need a database. However, since the use case here appears to be storing GPS data, it would be reasonable to conclude that data is being actively consumed.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- bpicolo 10y agoReading is fine in an append-only datastore. That's my point. There's no stale reads if your data for a key that's never changed given quorum-style reads as far as I understand.