3 ms·

Do keep in mind that's entirely irrelevant for uniquely-keyed data points. (append-only database usage)

• Annatar 10y ago
  If one is only ever going to append to a database and never read it or use data in it, then one does not even need to store the data being appended, let alone need a database. However, since the use case here appears to be storing GPS data, it would be reasonable to conclude that data is being actively consumed.
  • deleted 10y ago
    [deleted]
  • bpicolo 10y ago
    Reading is fine in an append-only datastore. That's my point. There's no stale reads if your data for a key that's never changed given quorum-style reads as far as I understand.