3 ms·
The EU should absolutely have been willing to talk about it, yes! Article 50 was only put there because the British insisted on it. Read what the guy who wrote
by zigzigzag 10y ago
The EU should absolutely have been willing to talk about it, yes!
Article 50 was only put there because the British insisted on it. Read what the guy who wrote it thinks:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-eu-referendum-britain-theresa-may-article-50-not-supposed-meant-to-be-used-trigger-giuliano-a7156656.html http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-eu-refe...
- pavlov 10y agoThe EU (minus Britain) is over 440 million people. Who should have been willing to talk? About what? Cameron did negotiate with EU leaders and tried to get concessions (on top of the existing special treatment that Thatcher and others negotiated over the years). Isn't that "talking"? Why didn't the UK government make a plan for the Leave option after those negotiations were concluded? The lack of clarity around Leave is really not the fault of anyone except the UK government. Blaming it on other states is just avoiding responsibility.