4 ms·
A similar project[1] which is also open source[2] and looks a lot similar. [1] https://shipyard-project.com/ https://shipyard-project.com/ [2] https://github.
by ysh7 10y ago
A similar project[1] which is also open source[2] and looks a lot similar.
[1] https://shipyard-project.com/ https://shipyard-project.com/
[2] https://github.com/shipyard/shipyard https://github.com/shipyard/shipyard
- deviantony 10y agoHey there ! We have a comparison table on our website: http://portainer.io/portainer-comparison.html http://portainer.io/portainer-comparison.html The main advantage against shipyard is that you only need to deploy one container to run Portainer, it's really simple and quick. Shipyard deployment is more complex.
- hultner 10y agoHave you ever thought about adding support for kvm/QEMU/virsh-based virtual machines as well? I've been looking for a easy to use interface that gives a comprehensive overview of virtual machines as well as containers as I'm often using a mix of both.
- ncresswell 10y agoAt the moment, we are focussed purely on docker containers... Our mantra, focus on one thing and do that one thing better than anyone else
- ysh7 10y agoThat comparison looks inaccurate. Shipyard does support tagging images. Also will support Swarm [1] mode (and volume/ network support) [1] https://github.com/shipyard/shipyard/pull/837 https://github.com/shipyard/shipyard/pull/837
- deviantony 10y agoThanks, I will update the comparison table. I did not include 'next' features in the table :)
- SeriousM 10y agoWell, it seems to cover the same functionality! But there is no windows support and does run in the shell instead of a docker image.
- Matthias247 10y agoCockpit [1] too, although that might be a bit more focused on single machine management than on clusters (don't use any of those - so I can't tell for sure) [1] http://cockpit-project.org/ http://cockpit-project.org/