Mostly I agree, except they're not sacrificing a lot of power compared to competitors, with the exception of not using certain power hungry components (GPU, RAM

Mostly I agree, except they're not sacrificing a lot of power compared to competitors, with the exception of not using certain power hungry components (GPU, RAM). Apple is clearly moving, as you have noted, to ALL portable computers prioritizing portability over raw power. This is something I agree with, and something others don't, but it's not a "disappointment" as fact so much as a difference in philosophy. As a professional GIS user and engineering drawing reviewer I theoretically should have opted for a more powerful laptop to replace my work machine this fall, but instead went with the smallest, lightest machine my company was able to provide that still met my day to day usage needs. I travel a lot and portability was high priority. For me, Apple is on the right side on the portability/power curve.