8 ms·
"Mobile advertising revenue represented approximately 84% of advertising revenue for the third quarter of 2016, up from approximately 78% of advertising revenue
by jbob2000 10y ago
"Mobile advertising revenue represented approximately 84% of advertising revenue for the third quarter of 2016, up from approximately 78% of advertising revenue in the third quarter of 2015."
Is advertising dead on the desktop?
- rdslw 10y agoNah. You can only thank uncle do-not-evil-till-IPO-Google that they still block browser extensions on mobile. Resulting in no adblockers :-(
- euyyn 10y agoAs if people would go through the trouble of opening Facebook in a mobile browser instead of just using the app.
- rdslw 10y agoMore and more people (myself incl) are not using fb app. Reasons: * all time location tracking * inability to block ads (firefox allows to block ads on android) * making it harder to induce compulsive fb usage (its addictive) * battery usage (this is huge, try it)
- nf05papsjfVbc 10y agoAlso you don't need to let FB get the entire gamut of permissions possible on the phone.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- saiya-jin 10y agoI do walk through it, it's painless (1 extra tap on screen) and it's exactly to not have FB apps on cell phone and not have ads displayed. I use FB less, which is good for healthier life. FB long lost its glamour, it's just another RSS news feed about friends/interests. Same for my fiancee.
- rdslw 10y agoNah. You can only thank uncle do-not-evil-till-IPO-Google that they still block browser extensions on mobile. Resulting in no adblockers :-(
- a13n 10y agoOr is desktop traffic dead? :)
- wesd 10y agoAssuming users are not on both mobile and desktop, then the desktop is around 100 million (DAU less Mobile DAUs): Daily active users (DAUs) – DAUs were 1.18 billion on average for September 2016, an increase of 17% year-over-year. Mobile DAUs – Mobile DAUs were 1.09 billion on average for September 2016, an increase of 22% year-over-year.
- wmeredith 10y agoI use Facebook a lot to keep up with my family. My usage is probably 99% mobile.
- meira 10y agoNope. And I, if I was Facebook, would not be proud of this stats. Don't put all your eggs in the same basket. Now, FB and Google has the opposite profit behavior. And I think it will be bad to both of them. Maybe they will meet in the middle, and lose their cash cow.
- the_watcher 10y agoDesktop revenue is growing too. Just not at the same rate as mobile. They have not ignored their desktop platform, in fact, the ad product is still designed for creating desktop ads, while they offer lots of tips and tools for optimizing them for mobile.
- Analemma_ 10y ago> Don't put all your eggs in the same basket. This is a strange complaint. A couple years ago, Facebook was making 90% of its money on the desktop, and people were saying the same thing. Now they have (very successfully) diversified, and the complaint is still there?
- serge2k 10y agoI don't think it counts as diversification if you just move all your eggs to a different basket.
- brianwawok 10y agoThey added videos
- meira 10y agoIf it was a problem, why would it not be now? Only because it is said that the mobile basket is bigger? It may be less deep. Google still makes a lot more than FB.
- matt4077 10y agoI believe it's a result of install-this-app ads being the only format that delivers measurable results.
- treebeard901 10y ago> Is advertising dead on the desktop? It could mean that the only thing keeping the ad supported internet alive is the lack of AD blockers on mobile operating systems.
- cloudjacker 10y agolack of their ubiquitous use you mean? ios added ad blockers and put the ad sector in a tizzy
- MikeKusold 10y agoiOS ad blockers only apply to webkit views. Facebook's app is not effected by ad blockers.
- saiya-jin 10y agoi will never ever install FB app or FB messenger on my cell phone anymore. Firefox with adblock, and if I can't message, well then there is SMS/Viber/Whatsapp/Hangouts/whateva.
- unclebucknasty 10y agoAccording to [0], mobile ads are expected to surpass desktop in 2017. On another note (related to the link I just provided), is it me or is that Google AMP service completely heinous? It seems to hide publisher content behind Google URLs and nearly force publishers to integrate to it to land in top results. Why aren't people pissed about this "takeover"? What am I missing? [0] https://www.google.com/amp/amp.timeinc.net/fortune/2016/06/20/mobile-internet-ad-spending-desktop/ https://www.google.com/amp/amp.timeinc.net/fortune/2016/06/2...
- brianwawok 10y agoAmp is amazing. Without amp it's pages full of full screen popovers that take 30 seconds to re see.
- unclebucknasty 10y agoCould they have done this without making the underlying full pages/site inaccessible?
- JBReefer 10y agoNo one seems to have gotten it yet, but: Instagram. You want to reach the cool kids, you must advertise on Instagram, and the only serious way to use ig is the app.
- spurgu 10y agoInstagram has ads?
- JBReefer 10y agoTons of them, in between posts, and they're fairly well targeted.
- prawn 10y agoI manage three accounts and in the main one, I've never seen ads. Can't work out why.
- us0r 10y ago3 samples I just took (which actually made me realize i get a ton of ads cause I didn't scroll very far for this): https://i.gyazo.com/5d48e7d926ad5e237536c9dfb99d6aa1.png https://i.gyazo.com/5d48e7d926ad5e237536c9dfb99d6aa1.png https://i.gyazo.com/0194219ec43f3ce6e386f9d5b2443bc3.jpg https://i.gyazo.com/0194219ec43f3ce6e386f9d5b2443bc3.jpg https://i.gyazo.com/e7904940fab2d6b610cbac5f83d119d8.png https://i.gyazo.com/e7904940fab2d6b610cbac5f83d119d8.png The last one is a gif or video.
- cerved 10y agoYou're excluded from the audience?
- xenihn 10y agoYes, users plugging products in their pictures/posts in exchange for money or free samples.
- atishay811 10y agoYou don't have good ad blockers on mobile. With native apps ads are easier to show. You can download and cache them in the background.
- vgeek 10y agoFor web? Firefox + uBlock origin works great on Android for web. Organic SERPs are actually visible.
- png_hero 10y agois this all free-to-play mobile app installs? if so, worrisome.