4 ms·
It depends on the maturity of the company. If you want everyone going for broke, options are better because there's no downside if the company goes under. If y
by mathattack 10y ago
It depends on the maturity of the company. If you want everyone going for broke, options are better because there's no downside if the company goes under. If you want people to be more conservative, RSUs are better because they balance downside and upside. So companies aiming for home runs are better serviced by options, while companies looking for predictable quarterly earnings are better served by RSUs.
- sickrumbear 10y agoCould you clarify your point about no downside if the company goes under? If the options are underwater then you get nothing, yet if you have RSUs, they'd be worth whatever a share of the company is worth (liquidity because of public/ private notwithstanding)
- mathattack 10y agoWhen you get options, your starting point is effectively zero because the strike price usually is zero. So if the stock goes down, you are still at zero - you just don't exercise the option. You have upside but no downside. If you have an RSU, you have the same upside and downside - 1 for 1 with the price. Note - this isn't 100% accurate as options that are not in the money still have some value but the idea is more upside than downside.