3 ms·

Still no desktop client?

• berdario 10y ago
  The desktop app is available since almost 1 year (in closed beta at the beginning), and recently apparently it's also working with iOS https://whispersystems.org/blog/signal-desktop/ https://whispersystems.org/blog/signal-desktop/ It's also a real app[1], independent from the phone's: after the initial key exchange, you can send/receive messages even when your phone is off [1] Compare with the Whatsapp webapp, which solves/sidesteps the E2E encryption among multiple devices conundrum by simply routing everything through the phone. The Signal app is also written with web technologies, so it might not be palatable for everyone, but it's a good compromise imho
  • piotrjurkiewicz 10y ago
    Are you kidding me? Do you consider this Chrome extension as a 'real app' (sic!)? I won't install Chrome just to host Signal extension.
    • mahyarm 10y ago
      Almost every modern desktop chat app is a web app, which is what a chrome app is. It's how something like franz is possible: http://meetfranz.com/ http://meetfranz.com/
      • piotrjurkiewicz 10y ago
        I all cases of 'modern desktop chat app' you are talking about, I can use it by opening its website with any modern browser. Signal is the only one which requires me to install one particular browser.
        • berdario 10y ago
          If you open them in a browser when you're offline, you won't be able to load/read your messages (yes, I know about HTML5 manifests for offline data... but that's a mess), but with Signal you can. Moreover, being able to vet/verify the updates (which you can apparently even block altogether) before running the app is of paramount importance for a secure app like Signal. With a run-of-the-mill webapp that's also impossible. Again: tradeoffs. I'd prefer if Signal desktop was built on something different, but I still happily use it as is everyday.
• tdkl 10y ago
  This is the main reason I've got some people on Wire instead.