4 ms·
> Now, the JS community seems to be thinking more about stability and backwards compatibility. That's very welcome, at least from the perspective of this grumpy
by xentronium 10y ago
> Now, the JS community seems to be thinking more about stability and backwards compatibility. That's very welcome, at least from the perspective of this grumpy server-side developer.
That's exactly why the blog post suggests using yarn instead of npm, isn't it?
- lucideer 10y agoHave you used yarn? Do you know what it is? It's a fully backwards compatible client built on the npm packaging system, using npm's repository, and built in collaboration with the npm team.
- noir_lord 10y agoIts also awesome, I switched when it was on HN a while back and its been amazing. I seldom get excited about JS tools but yarn is an exception.
- boobsbr 10y agoHave you tried PNPM or IED?
- gcd 10y agoIt's not quite ready for production yet. There are still some bugs with dev dependencies and private repos that need to be addressed before we can use it.