> you think Google should hide that fact to give Microsoft breathing room. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12842909 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1

> you think Google should hide that fact to give Microsoft breathing room. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12842909 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12842909 I have full confidence that one of the most mature software security groups in tech isn't looking for breathing room on an 0day. Since you've been scouting out my posts, you know better than to put words in my mouth given that one of my biggest assertions here is that Microsoft's already moving as fast as it can and that a disclosure speeds nothing up here. > Lots more words I appreciate the attempt at a dodge, so I'll get right back to it: since you asserted that Google disclosed the details even though they did not, would you rather have had the disclosure include the exact vulnerability?