4 ms·
What I'm ultimately arguing here is that: even after the regulators step in and make make them give a fuck, I mean really give a fuck, and they are forced to fi
by drvdevd 10y ago
What I'm ultimately arguing here is that: even after the regulators step in and make make them give a fuck, I mean really give a fuck, and they are forced to fix the low hanging fruits, these botnets or other similar machinations, will still exist. In fact, if we assume the regulations work and actually make things harder to exploit, we can add in the knowledge that the price for using and creating IoT botnets will go up - possibly making botnet creation a more lucrative career than IoT defense. I'm saying we have a technical conundrum that regulation can't regulate away.
- st3v3r 10y agoI completely and totally disagree. You're basically saying that, because it will become harder in the future, we shouldn't even try.
- drvdevd 10y agoWell I think we can agree to disagree on regulation as the method of fixing the issue. Of course we should do something. I'll admit I'm not sure what though and have no better proposal. I just believe regulation is too blunt an instrument.
- st3v3r 10y agoI don't see how anything but regulation would do it. The companies clearly don't give a shit, and they won't, as they can't really be held accountable.