I'd suggest one of the main reasons that Gizmodo published the guys name is that Gruber implied immediately that they stole the prototype How does that support

I'd suggest one of the main reasons that Gizmodo published the guys name is that Gruber implied immediately that they stole the prototype How does that support the case that the phone was lost? Publishing the name of the guy who found the phone might support your case, but publishing the name of the phone's owner isn't helpful - you can steal something from a known owner.