> How is it acceptable that the Chairman of one of the largest corporations in American can fund a secret startup that works directly for the [candidate's] camp

> How is it acceptable that the Chairman of one of the largest corporations in American can fund a secret startup that works directly for the [candidate's] campaign? Meanwhile, potentially contributing hundreds of thousands of dollars personally to the [candidate's] foundation? Not only that, but the company's main revenue is from its ability to influence people's actions, e.g. voting, via advertising.