3 ms·

I was about to graduate graduate school, I had finals, final papers, and interviews. I had 2 companies which had hiring puzzles, and interviewed at 5 companies

by kaddar 16y ago

I was about to graduate graduate school, I had finals, final papers, and interviews. I had 2 companies which had hiring puzzles, and interviewed at 5 companies. I was really interested in ITA, unfortunately I couldn't schedule in the time to work on the hiring puzzle within the 2 week window this occurred. I sort of imagine that these puzzles have an outlier effect: it removes the top and bottom users from a selection pool. Maybe that's okay, personally I was a bit disappointed at the missed opportunity. One way they could improve this is by giving the puzzles expiration dates, removing the fear of completing one far ahead of the interview process, and having it expire. You'll still miss out on those who haven't heard of ITA until the near-graduation career fairs, but it will at least improve the situation.

sokoloff 16y ago
Why do you think this would have adverse selection against the top of the pool? I can clearly see how it would act a barrier to application for the bottom candidates (a good thing for the company), and I can see how it would reduce the number of applicants who are applying "everywhere they can think of" (also probably good for the company in terms of getting a more qualified [in the sales-conversion-rate sense] base of applicants). In my experience, the very top of the applicant pools aren't applying to a particularly large number of places.
- kaddar 16y ago
  Although the top tier candidates may not be applying at many places, they are receiving many more first, second, or even third interviews. Thus, their timing is tight in a two week window near the end of school when they start receiving offers. Near-Bottom-tier candidates may receive less interviews and are incentivized to perform more desperate acts in order to receive interviews, and thus have more time for puzzle-based applications. But as I said, it's not too big of a deal, if they would only post ahead of time how long puzzles would be active, so one could complete them before this tightly-timed period.

by kaddar 16y ago

sokoloff 16y ago

Why do you think this would have adverse selection against the top of the pool? I can clearly see how it would act a barrier to application for the bottom candidates (a good thing for the company), and I can see how it would reduce the number of applicants who are applying "everywhere they can think of" (also probably good for the company in terms of getting a more qualified [in the sales-conversion-rate sense] base of applicants). In my experience, the very top of the applicant pools aren't applying to a particularly large number of places.

kaddar 16y ago
Although the top tier candidates may not be applying at many places, they are receiving many more first, second, or even third interviews. Thus, their timing is tight in a two week window near the end of school when they start receiving offers. Near-Bottom-tier candidates may receive less interviews and are incentivized to perform more desperate acts in order to receive interviews, and thus have more time for puzzle-based applications. But as I said, it's not too big of a deal, if they would only post ahead of time how long puzzles would be active, so one could complete them before this tightly-timed period.