3 ms·

They can only release information they have. If they had the information, I'm sure they would release it - like they have in the past released information dama

They can only release information they have. If they had the information, I'm sure they would release it - like they have in the past released information damaging to the Bush administration years ago. Do you have evidence that they have information that they are suppressing?

tdb7893 10y ago
I agree, I don't like Assange but I think it's whoever is giving him the leaks and not him who is biased. I just wonder who it is that is doing the leaking
- davesque 10y ago
  He has a TV show on RT (https://www.rt.com/tags/the-julian-assange-show/ https://www.rt.com/tags/the-julian-assange-show/), a Russian state-run news channel which is widely criticized as being a propaganda outlet (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT_(TV_network)#Propaganda_and_related_issues https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT_(TV_network)#Propaganda_and...). That seems like a massive conflict of interest to me. I also don't imagine it would take very long for him to lose his show if he published any seriously damaging Russian leaks.
  - tdb7893 10y ago
    Yeah, I looked at the "America" section of the news site and it's very anti-America and very anti-Clinton. Having a show on there is concerning and looking at the descriptions for the episodes for the shows it looks like Assange really doesn't like the US government at all. EDIT: I still don't think he's releasing these because of bias but I think he's very happy with the effect of the leaks that he has gotten
davesque 10y ago
I don't have evidence that they're sitting on information. But there are plenty of things they've done in recent months that make them sound almost alt-right -- at times seeming extremely obstinate or even belligerent. Here's a fairly well-written article that discusses some of them: https://www.wired.com/2016/07/wikileaks-officially-lost-moral-high-ground/ https://www.wired.com/2016/07/wikileaks-officially-lost-mora...
- ConfuciusSay02 10y ago
  The main criticism seems to be that they publish personal information. When the Manning cables that exposed various corrupt and illegal actions of the Bush administration were released, the exact same criticisms were leveled at them. I'm failing to see the difference between then and now.

tdb7893 10y ago

I agree, I don't like Assange but I think it's whoever is giving him the leaks and not him who is biased. I just wonder who it is that is doing the leaking

davesque 10y ago
He has a TV show on RT (https://www.rt.com/tags/the-julian-assange-show/ https://www.rt.com/tags/the-julian-assange-show/), a Russian state-run news channel which is widely criticized as being a propaganda outlet (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT_(TV_network)#Propaganda_and_related_issues https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT_(TV_network)#Propaganda_and...). That seems like a massive conflict of interest to me. I also don't imagine it would take very long for him to lose his show if he published any seriously damaging Russian leaks.
- tdb7893 10y ago
  Yeah, I looked at the "America" section of the news site and it's very anti-America and very anti-Clinton. Having a show on there is concerning and looking at the descriptions for the episodes for the shows it looks like Assange really doesn't like the US government at all. EDIT: I still don't think he's releasing these because of bias but I think he's very happy with the effect of the leaks that he has gotten

davesque 10y ago

I don't have evidence that they're sitting on information. But there are plenty of things they've done in recent months that make them sound almost alt-right -- at times seeming extremely obstinate or even belligerent. Here's a fairly well-written article that discusses some of them: https://www.wired.com/2016/07/wikileaks-officially-lost-moral-high-ground/ https://www.wired.com/2016/07/wikileaks-officially-lost-mora...

ConfuciusSay02 10y ago
The main criticism seems to be that they publish personal information. When the Manning cables that exposed various corrupt and illegal actions of the Bush administration were released, the exact same criticisms were leveled at them. I'm failing to see the difference between then and now.