7 ms·

Is there a document somewhere that summaries the proposed changes from HTML 5 to 5.1?

• piotrkubisa 10y ago
  I assume this document [1] may cover some changes. [1]: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/REC-html51-20161101/changes.html#changes https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/REC-html51-20161101/changes.html#...
  • 0x0 10y ago
    Interesting that "Having title, or writing email to a friend does not make an img missing alt conformant." What if you write an email to an enemy? https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/REC-html51-20161101/changes.html#changes-to-existing-features https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/REC-html51-20161101/changes.html#...
    • rudolf0 10y ago
      >What if you write an email to an enemy? Then I would probably prefer to use <blink> and <marquee>.
    • guipsp 10y ago
      What does that even mean?
• rspeer 10y ago
  I found this table [1] that lists features specific to HTML 5.1 and their status in current versions of browsers. [1] https://w3c.github.io/test-results/html51/implementation-report.html https://w3c.github.io/test-results/html51/implementation-rep...
• myfonj 10y ago
  There is also a diffed single page HTMLs at github [0], (11 MiB download; quite surprised my Firefox managed to render it). What I've found interesting is that markup for insertions and deletions in this file is ("non-semantic") `<span class="delete">..</span><span class="insert">..</span>`, instead of presumably more semantically appropriate `<del>..</del><ins>..</ins>` [1]. [0] https://github.com/w3c/html/blob/master/diff/html5to51diff.html https://github.com/w3c/html/blob/master/diff/html5to51diff.h... [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/REC-html51-20161101/edits.html#elementdef-ins https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/REC-html51-20161101/edits.html#el...
• Chyzwar 10y ago
  No, it is W3 having ass pain. HTML5 is living standard: https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#When_will_HTML5_be_finished.3F https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#When_will_HTML5_be_finished...
  • sctb 10y ago
    Replying like this to a reasonable question is not the kind of civil discussion we ask for on HN.
    • Chyzwar 10y ago
      This is valid answer. This spec published by W3 have no practical value and only reflect some people political aspirations that were crushed when HTML5 won over XHTML2. In fact whole this W3 vs whatwg is harmful for the web. If W3 want to be useful they should either design new standard or contribute back to HTML5. Currently they hijack other people work and claim for their own. Expression I used "ass pain" is very clumsy translation of "ból dupy" and maybe better It would be to say butthurt.