3 ms·
An attack can be quite effective even if the traffic from a single home is insignificant. I don't need ISPs to mess with my connection any more than they do al
by clarry 10y ago
An attack can be quite effective even if the traffic from a single home is insignificant.
I don't need ISPs to mess with my connection any more than they do already.
- onion2k 10y agoAn attack can be quite effective even if the traffic from a single home is insignificant. In a recent attack there were 145607 devices sending >1.5Tbps[1]. That's a lot from individual connections. (From: https://twitter.com/olesovhcom/status/779297257199964160 https://twitter.com/olesovhcom/status/779297257199964160 )
- clarry 10y agoAbout 1.4 megabytes on average is not that much. Even so, this one wasn't a particularly sophisticated attack. Even if we could weed out this particular type, many a DoS rely on amplification or asymmetrical computational cost with respect to the size of the request. So if we concluded that 1.4 MB/s of HTTP or DNS or plain TCP were a lot and managed to block these senders, it would be far from a universal solution against DDoS originating from domestic hosts. And there's reason to believe we'll see much larger botnets unless manufacturers of IoT devices start taking security seriously. So tomorrow 0.14 MB/s per home could be plenty. What cost would this blocking incur? How often would I have to call my ISP because they blocked perfectly legitimate traffic? Unfortunately maybe not that often, because after the first few calls I'd probably figure that they are too big to give a shit about my problems.