> Cursive is awful, with no practical redeeming values. I've not seen a study, but the classic advantage of cursive that is still brought up today is that it i

> Cursive is awful, with no practical redeeming values. I've not seen a study, but the classic advantage of cursive that is still brought up today is that it is faster than print. Personally for fun and potential faster writing I've just started learning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spencerian_script https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spencerian_script. My handwriting is awful (both print and cursive) so unfortunately I won't be a good test case on whether it is easier to write fast legible cursive than print unless I also go relearn print.