3 ms·
I'm not a fan of Wikileaks but much of what the article states isn't a secret. It's clear that Google's founders for years has been trying to gain a political a
by norea-armozel 10y ago
I'm not a fan of Wikileaks but much of what the article states isn't a secret. It's clear that Google's founders for years has been trying to gain a political advantage over other corporations by being friendlier to the US govt. It makes sense since the US govt is behind the times and Google needs a friend in the US govt to make treaties that would give them an advantage over competitors in emerging markets. This is a win/win for both involved. I'm not saying this is acceptable/moral/desirable, I'm merely saying that this is how the real world of international politics works. I just wish more folks wouldn't think for a moment a corporation will stop being a corporation for the sake of it's founder's original intentions (assuming Schmidt and company were/are honest with us). At least in that clear headed acceptance of Google's agenda maybe we all can individually (and maybe collectively? I know it's quite a bit to ask.) adjust our strategies to limit their abuse of our data.
- norikki 10y agoI love the "this isnt news" argument. "You shouldnt care about collusion revealed by Wikileaks/whoever because everyone kind of already knew about it." "This is how the 'real world' works" Another bs argument. Yes. Those who have been paying attention already know what Assange is talking about. That does not excuse Google in any way. "Don't be evil" is a pretty low bar to set. And Google is so corrupted at this point they can't even "live up to their founder's original intentions".
- norea-armozel 10y agoI never said you shouldn't care. But it seems you ass-umed that I said as much. But go ahead, pretend I did say that and fantasize you're the only person that's worried about the state of the world. I'll just be here popping my popcorn to see who else smacks you upside the head for your pearl clutching performity. ;)