> The part you conveniently omitted was the most important part in that sentence. Speaking grammatically, that's the least important part of the sentence. Quo

> The part you conveniently omitted was the most important part in that sentence. Speaking grammatically, that's the least important part of the sentence. Quoting my reply to the same point elsewhere, > Add on top of that the trivialization of "Windows 10" as the noun in a second-order preposition of place as well as the reference to Chrome as the primary subject of the sentence, and even basic analysis of the sentence in question shows a bias. A proper non-promotional security disclosure would've included multiple mitigating strategies, even if they're user actions such as browsing only trusted sites until a patch is released. Even if that sentence was worded differently ("Browsers which block win32k.sys system calls using the Win32k lockdown mitigation on Windows 10, such as Chrome, prevent exploitation of this sandbox escape vulnerability."), I would've given them a partial pass.