4 ms·
Here is an interesting statement from the article that rings true for me: "A lot of it boils down to this concept: We demand Apple innovate, but we insist they
by mjsweet 10y ago
Here is an interesting statement from the article that rings true for me:
"A lot of it boils down to this concept: We demand Apple innovate, but we insist they don’t change anything."
- charlesism 10y agoThat's the part I thought was completely out to lunch. The people who really drone endlessly about "innovation" are the finance section people. The pro and dev customers who are complaining now - ie: the ones who cheered for "no new features" back when 10.6 was announced - generally want better computers, and they generally focus on speed and stability.
- basch 10y agoThere are two pretty simple ways this could have been avoided. 1) A 12 and 14in macbook ( / air) instead of what they released. 2) A 13 and 15in macbook pro that put power ahead of battery and thinness. 2b) Pros having the option to get 32GB RAM, which I am sure will be part of next years model. Apple generally leaves out a feature they could have easily shipped, soas to make next years look like a bigger step. 2 Macbook/Airs and 2 pros, and eliminating all other SKUs would make more people happy, and make things simpler. Instead they taint the Pro name, and leave the old Macbook in the lineup.