4 ms·
I agree (and I am no fan of Trump, and would never vote for him). "Tea Leaves" makes one other interesting claim: >Different in every way from traffic seen on
by meowface 10y ago
I agree (and I am no fan of Trump, and would never vote for him).
"Tea Leaves" makes one other interesting claim:
>Different in every way from traffic seen on adjacent servers managed by the same server company, this specially configured server has been exclusively corresponding with Alfa-Bank and Spectrum
If he can back up the claims about IP restriction (how could he really prove this, anyway?) & the traffic truly being different from all other Cendyn mail domains, then this does deserve some further scrutiny.
>Tea Leaves claims -- but also does not provide evidence for -- that the DNS records for Trump-Email.com were pulled after Alfa Bank was contacted for a statement.
I actually have access to some of the same research systems and can confirm that that part is accurate. (I can provide full evidence if you like.) It doesn't necessarily mean anything nefarious, though. The Trump campaign formally stated it was an old record that's no longer in use, so decommissioning the domain isn't necessarily unusual.
- kobayashi 10y agoCan you say as to how long the trump-email[dot]com was active before it started SERVFAILing? Also, I'd love to see the evidence if you're actually able to provide it.
- hackuser 10y ago> decommissioning the domain isn't necessarily unusual It is the timing that is unusual: The Trump organization decommissioned the domain right after Alfa Bank - and only Alfa Bank, not the Trump organization - was asked about it. It's very unlikely to be coincidence. And according to the source, the Trump org setup a new domain to replace it and it was first contacted by Alfa. Both are strong evidence of coordination between humans at Alfa Bank and Trump org. to secure and continue the communication. What they were communicating, of course, is unknown to us.