3 ms·
It should be pointed out that most vulnerabilities are, in fact, being exploited before they are patched. Citation in this article: https://medium.com/@xParXnoi
by XparXnoiAx 10y ago
It should be pointed out that most vulnerabilities are, in fact, being exploited before they are patched. Citation in this article: https://medium.com/@xParXnoiAx/irresponsible-disclosure-52d08cddcd07 https://medium.com/@xParXnoiAx/irresponsible-disclosure-52d0...
- fulafel 10y agoSo that's linking to a Forbes article that's paraphrasing this study from 2012: https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~tdumitra/public_documents/bilge12_zero_day.pdf https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~tdumitra/public_documents/bilge12... It doesn't support your assertion but it's still interesting 2008-2010 data from an antivirus vendor. It's talking about about how long some vulnerabilities were exploited by malware before getting disclosed, use in targeted attacks, and so on.
- XparXnoiAx 10y agoThe study says that most vulnerabilities were being exploited before being disclosed.
- fulafel 10y agoI don't think it says that about the set of all vulnerabilities (IOW - citation needed!). It does say "In this paper, we consider only exploits that have been used in real-world attacks before the corresponding vulnerabilities were disclosed" so it's unsurprising that in their dataset this is the case :)
- XparXnoiAx 10y agoYeap, you're right, I misread. Here is a quote from the paper: "15% of these exploits were created before the disclosure of the corresponding vulnerability." So there's a lower bound.