I read part 1,2,3,4 and found multiple issues with this article. In part 2 they show results for alaska with fractional numbers. What isn't clear is that it's a

I read part 1,2,3,4 and found multiple issues with this article. In part 2 they show results for alaska with fractional numbers. What isn't clear is that it's actually results from part 4 where they edited the access DB to change the numbers to match set percentages they wanted. Second reading those emails in part 2 it seems they are discussing that the per candidate numbers in weighted elections (when the machines are used for those) then adding them they show totals with one less digit. But that only matters if they have fractional parts which they haven't shown to have happened in a real election. There doesn't seem to be any proof of actual fraud here. Just a bunch of suppositions.