5 ms·
The 16GB limit is the real issue for me personally. There are plenty of Windows/Unix laptops that can do 32GB or more so all the excuses I've been hearing are l
by Randgalt 10y ago
The 16GB limit is the real issue for me personally. There are plenty of Windows/Unix laptops that can do 32GB or more so all the excuses I've been hearing are ludicrous.
- aq3cn 10y agohttp://superuser.com/questions/40113/does-installing-larger-ram-means-consuming-more-energy http://superuser.com/questions/40113/does-installing-larger-... Increased power consumption with higher RAM may be true.
- Randgalt 10y agoSure - but I (and most devs I know) don't care. Let us have the option, Apple.
- sliken 10y agoA bit more sure. Although generally power scales mostly with the number of chips (or number of dimms). The graph mentions SDR, DDR, and DDR2 for a factor of 6 decrease in watts per GB. Presumably DDR3 and more important DDR3L have continues to improve the watts/GB. Generally the CPU/GPU and LCD are the leading consumers of power on laptops. LCDs get somewhat warm, but have a large surface to dissipate heat from. CPUs on the other hand often need active cooling, where dimms (generally) do not. Seems unlikely compared to a 28 Watt CPU and a 500 nit 13.3" display that the 16 -> 32GB upgrade would be particularly noticeable. Especially when apple claims that the low end and high end models have the same battery life, despite the low end model having a 10% larger battery and lower power CPU, GPU, less ports, and no touch panel.
- pyrophane 10y agoOut of curiosity, what are you doing where 16GB is becoming an issue?