4 ms·

This has actually proven to be the case; there are a number of studies on assaults committed against taxi drivers, and all (I've seen) come to the conclusion th

by nickff 10y ago

This has actually proven to be the case; there are a number of studies on assaults committed against taxi drivers, and all (I've seen) come to the conclusion that males and African-Americans are much more likely to be violent.

deleted 10y ago
[deleted]
intortus 10y ago
These comments make me feel almost like a Luddite. I don't fear technology, but I fear technologists and their apologists.
- nickff 10y ago
  I am not apologizing for anyone. It should be rather unsurprising that men are more violent to taxi-drivers than women, as men are incarcerated at a rate between 10-30 times higher than women.
deleted 10y ago
[deleted]
markhall 10y ago
Can you provide any reputable data that proves this to be accurate? Please share the link or provide evidence, otherwise you are exasperating the problem that the article outlines.
- nickff 10y ago
  I have stopped responding when people simply ask for citations. Saying "citation needed" is a low-value comment, and I have better things to do than look up studies which I've read, and you will probably dismiss out-of-hand. If you have good evidence which contradicts my comment, please post it, so that myself and others can learn.
  - sanderjd 10y ago
    I definitely understand the inclination to avoid doing this sort of citation-finding work, but I think the approach you've chosen is a worse one than you think. You say comments that only ask for citation are low value, and that may be true, but I think comments that are of the form, "the studies I have seen say (insert very debatable thing)", without providing any support, are even lower value. By this logic, you can say anything you want, while implying that it has been studied by experts, when in fact you just made it up. I wish this were a straw-man hypothetical, but this sort of discourse is actually so common now that whenever I see someone vaguely cite "something I have seen in studies", I assume it actually means "something I heard someone say they saw in studies", and that it is totally fabricated. It's also pretty rich to have the position that you won't put in the work to back up your statements, but that those who call you out on that should be willing to do the work to disprove you. Just replying to you with "I have seen studies that say the opposite" is equally as (un)convincing as what you've said.
    - nickff 10y ago
      I wrote a comment which described the state of my knowledge, and would be fine if another commenter said they disagreed for any reason (anecdotal or evidenciary). If the respondent had said "I looked, but could not find studies which correspond with what you are saying", I would have made more effort. The problem behavior which I have seen cropping up on Hacker News is people asking for citations as a quick and easy way of invalidating other people's views, while justifying downvotes (which have become far too common). I have also observed that many will ask for studies, then either ignore them for viewpoint or ad hominiem reasons, or attempt to invalidate the study by nit-picking. If the original commenter lied or pulled numbers out of thin air, it is fair to call them out (in my view), but laziness on the part of the respondent is no justification for snark.
      - narrowrail 10y ago
        Apparently, some of us consider what you said to be an "extraordinary claim" requiring evidence. You are essentially saying: "Prove 'the state of my knowledge' is wrong." The burden of proof lies with the original claim maker, not the respondent. This is not a bar room conversation from the 90s, we are literally on the internet; citing one's sources isn't too much to ask.
Kenji 10y ago
Frequentist statistics is racist, don't you know? In today's progressive society, it is forbidden to make informed decisions based on statistics. Racial profiling is the devil - if the clerk said the robber was black, you better spend 50% of the time searching for a white guy, or else you're really deplorable.

by nickff 10y ago

deleted 10y ago

[deleted]

intortus 10y ago

These comments make me feel almost like a Luddite. I don't fear technology, but I fear technologists and their apologists.

nickff 10y ago
I am not apologizing for anyone. It should be rather unsurprising that men are more violent to taxi-drivers than women, as men are incarcerated at a rate between 10-30 times higher than women.

deleted 10y ago

[deleted]

markhall 10y ago

Can you provide any reputable data that proves this to be accurate? Please share the link or provide evidence, otherwise you are exasperating the problem that the article outlines.

nickff 10y ago
I have stopped responding when people simply ask for citations. Saying "citation needed" is a low-value comment, and I have better things to do than look up studies which I've read, and you will probably dismiss out-of-hand. If you have good evidence which contradicts my comment, please post it, so that myself and others can learn.
- sanderjd 10y ago
  I definitely understand the inclination to avoid doing this sort of citation-finding work, but I think the approach you've chosen is a worse one than you think. You say comments that only ask for citation are low value, and that may be true, but I think comments that are of the form, "the studies I have seen say (insert very debatable thing)", without providing any support, are even lower value. By this logic, you can say anything you want, while implying that it has been studied by experts, when in fact you just made it up. I wish this were a straw-man hypothetical, but this sort of discourse is actually so common now that whenever I see someone vaguely cite "something I have seen in studies", I assume it actually means "something I heard someone say they saw in studies", and that it is totally fabricated. It's also pretty rich to have the position that you won't put in the work to back up your statements, but that those who call you out on that should be willing to do the work to disprove you. Just replying to you with "I have seen studies that say the opposite" is equally as (un)convincing as what you've said.
  - nickff 10y ago
    I wrote a comment which described the state of my knowledge, and would be fine if another commenter said they disagreed for any reason (anecdotal or evidenciary). If the respondent had said "I looked, but could not find studies which correspond with what you are saying", I would have made more effort. The problem behavior which I have seen cropping up on Hacker News is people asking for citations as a quick and easy way of invalidating other people's views, while justifying downvotes (which have become far too common). I have also observed that many will ask for studies, then either ignore them for viewpoint or ad hominiem reasons, or attempt to invalidate the study by nit-picking. If the original commenter lied or pulled numbers out of thin air, it is fair to call them out (in my view), but laziness on the part of the respondent is no justification for snark.
    - narrowrail 10y ago
      Apparently, some of us consider what you said to be an "extraordinary claim" requiring evidence. You are essentially saying: "Prove 'the state of my knowledge' is wrong." The burden of proof lies with the original claim maker, not the respondent. This is not a bar room conversation from the 90s, we are literally on the internet; citing one's sources isn't too much to ask.

Kenji 10y ago

Frequentist statistics is racist, don't you know? In today's progressive society, it is forbidden to make informed decisions based on statistics. Racial profiling is the devil - if the clerk said the robber was black, you better spend 50% of the time searching for a white guy, or else you're really deplorable.