4 ms·
that's hillarious. You asked the commentor for evidence of their claim, they provided it and you responded "ah well don't take it literally" So there's nothin
by raesene6 10y ago
that's hillarious. You asked the commentor for evidence of their claim, they provided it and you responded "ah well don't take it literally"
So there's nothing they could've said which would be right there either a) provide no evidence "ah your wrong" or b) provide evidence "ah don't take it literally"...
- angry-hacker 10y agoGo ahead and read in what context the tweet was written in. Paid astroturfers is a known fact. Probably for every political candidate nowadays.
- sigmar 10y ago>You don't have to take everything literally, do you? >Paid astroturfers is a known fact. I'm so confused. Are you arguing he wasn't serious about there being astroturfers? or that he was being serious and it's true?
- angry-hacker 10y agoHalf serious since he does not have enough proof, but it has become obvious the "paid trolls" or young politicians are doing it for both sides. Either they are directly or indirectly paid. I'm talking about the fact the guy really was attacked by a mob, wasn't he? Does two wrongs in your eyes makes one correct?